- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory                           GLSA 202105-02
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                                            https://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

  Severity: Low
     Title: stunnel: Improper certificate validation
      Date: May 26, 2021
      Bugs: #772146
        ID: 202105-02

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Synopsis
=======
Stunnel was not properly verifying TLS certificates, possibly allowing
an integrity/confidentiality compromise.

Background
=========
The stunnel program is designed to work as an SSL/TLS encryption
wrapper between a client and a local or remote server.

Affected packages
================
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
      Package              /     Vulnerable     /            Unaffected
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
   1  net-misc/stunnel              < 5.58                     >= 5.58

Description
==========
It was discovered that stunnel did not correctly verified the client
certificate when options "redirect" and "verifyChain" are used.

Impact
=====
A remote attacker could send a specially crafted certificate, possibly
resulting in a breach of integrity or confidentiality.

Workaround
=========
There is no known workaround at this time.

Resolution
=========
All stunnel users should upgrade to the latest version:

   # emerge --sync
   # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=net-misc/stunnel-5.58"

References
=========
[ 1 ] CVE-2021-20230
       https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20230

Availability
===========
This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at
the Gentoo Security Website:

  https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-02

Concerns?
========
Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the
confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost
importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to
security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at
https://bugs.gentoo.org.

License
======
Copyright 2021 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text
belongs to its owner(s).

The contents of this document are licensed under the
Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/


Gentoo: GLSA-202105-02: stunnel: Improper certificate validation

Stunnel was not properly verifying TLS certificates, possibly allowing an integrity/confidentiality compromise.

Summary

It was discovered that stunnel did not correctly verified the client certificate when options "redirect" and "verifyChain" are used.

Resolution

All stunnel users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=net-misc/stunnel-5.58"

References

[ 1 ] CVE-2021-20230 https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20230

Availability

This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-02

Concerns

Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users' machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to security@gentoo.org or alternatively, you may file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org.

Severity
Severity: Low
Title: stunnel: Improper certificate validation
Issued Date: May 26, 2021
Bugs: #772146
ID: 202105-02

Synopsis

Stunnel was not properly verifying TLS certificates, possibly allowing an integrity/confidentiality compromise.

Background

The stunnel program is designed to work as an SSL/TLS encryption wrapper between a client and a local or remote server.

Affected Packages

------------------------------------------------------------------- Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 net-misc/stunnel < 5.58 >= 5.58

Impact

===== A remote attacker could send a specially crafted certificate, possibly resulting in a breach of integrity or confidentiality.

Workaround

There is no known workaround at this time.

Related News