RedHat: RHSA-2019-0237:01 Moderate: etcd security, bug fix,

    Date31 Jan 2019
    CategoryRed Hat
    1346
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    An update for etcd is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA256
    
    =====================================================================
                       Red Hat Security Advisory
    
    Synopsis:          Moderate: etcd security, bug fix, and enhancement update
    Advisory ID:       RHSA-2019:0237-01
    Product:           Red Hat Enterprise Linux Extras
    Advisory URL:      https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0237
    Issue date:        2019-01-31
    CVE Names:         CVE-2018-16886 
    =====================================================================
    
    1. Summary:
    
    An update for etcd is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras.
    
    Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact
    of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which
    gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from
    the CVE link(s) in the References section.
    
    2. Relevant releases/architectures:
    
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras - aarch64, ppc64le, s390x, x86_64
    
    3. Description:
    
    The etcd packages provide a highly available key-value store for shared
    configuration.
    
    The following packages have been upgraded to a later upstream version: etcd
    (3.3.11). (BZ#1664290)
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * etcd: Improper Authentication in auth/store.go:AuthInfoFromTLS() via
    gRPC-gateway (CVE-2018-16886)
    
    For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS
    score, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in
    the References section.
    
    Red Hat would like to thank Matt Wheeler (Osirium) for reporting this
    issue.
    
    4. Solution:
    
    For details on how to apply this update, which includes the changes
    described in this advisory, refer to:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258
    
    5. Bugs fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/):
    
    1651034 - CVE-2018-16886 etcd: Improper Authentication in auth/store.go:AuthInfoFromTLS() via gRPC-gateway
    1664290 - Update etcd to the latest relevant upstream for AH 7.6.2
    
    6. Package List:
    
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extras:
    
    Source:
    etcd-3.3.11-2.el7.src.rpm
    
    aarch64:
    etcd-3.3.11-2.el7.aarch64.rpm
    etcd-debuginfo-3.3.11-2.el7.aarch64.rpm
    
    ppc64le:
    etcd-3.3.11-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
    etcd-debuginfo-3.3.11-2.el7.ppc64le.rpm
    
    s390x:
    etcd-3.3.11-2.el7.s390x.rpm
    etcd-debuginfo-3.3.11-2.el7.s390x.rpm
    
    x86_64:
    etcd-3.3.11-2.el7.x86_64.rpm
    etcd-debuginfo-3.3.11-2.el7.x86_64.rpm
    
    These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security.  Our key and
    details on how to verify the signature are available from
    https://access.redhat.com/security/team/key/
    
    7. References:
    
    https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-16886
    https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate
    
    8. Contact:
    
    The Red Hat security contact is . More contact
    details at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact/
    
    Copyright 2019 Red Hat, Inc.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1
    
    iQIVAwUBXFNLWNzjgjWX9erEAQjtPQ//fOigcP16RwGpUsq2gbKZjfSbctkms07E
    W1l927SCjgBLeaUAJUegaHBICA2U22bXXorUvfMjlC5csZ+YDlOmA6/+Q4KKAOyg
    SRLIcTmrg6UvhW66JnZWXExOnHA4uOPqkcAts22fgox7CNUcgJtY7seBW5Gw15RN
    9P28YL+QqeXhmEnEBVQL3TOOGpo/0DJmd5zbbx8E5IsPSxkwOQR26gZ+brpSg8R7
    IZy0/K8pyi8w+x3XWtIFUJciIUdlahB5nVLAOW7xbCx6O4Oqv4ZeUO/lUue7hs+K
    nXlL8vyV50boaqoI5hFpazX3f+DBbNENBukmpfGYBaChbp6H2xI9B/h/ZMUXDMp0
    1Mo7QDBuniBiu+JGmZhAy822dcm33TPtTmTe5migp2FO0ceC+Y5hmrpvC99jkgk6
    rsstZYd7m3zU9GQ2Ny7nOYkvVnjqBGFw0EaEWHg9ob05yWf6F+Fy2+1Z0I/V+FpE
    2DjlBdLCpPH0zD/1+vovp1bLrhr3YhQHBYnokXehkUiR2iCwSaMzQ+r1uxeyG3kl
    GoIjYBHHS3ijrZijgWE6+YPgZAQ+N53MQQSGtnlN2u5bt1UtEPhAgoMBsQQVdQbl
    YI8RWkXpqZ7quUJ/0HjUJEH/Vm4qMUkqZUVObogbIW5HXhhJryFwZgRzbpGSHTsH
    0Z98ggnHyEg=
    =v87c
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    --
    RHSA-announce mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhsa-announce
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.