SciLinux: SLSA-2019-2892-1 Important: qemu-kvm on SL6.x i386/x86_64

    Date24 Sep 2019
    313
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    QEMU: slirp: heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented datagrams (CVE-2018-11806) * QEMU: slirp: heap buffer overflow in tcp_emu() (CVE-2019-6778) * QEMU: ne2000: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow issue (CVE-2018-10839) * QEMU: pcnet: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow (CVE-2018-17962) * QEMU: qxl: null pointer dereference while releasing spice resources (CVE-2019-1 [More...]
    Synopsis: Important: qemu-kvm security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:2892-1
    Issue Date:        2019-09-24
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2018-11806
                       CVE-2019-6778
                       CVE-2019-12155
                       CVE-2018-10839
                       CVE-2018-17962
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * QEMU: slirp: heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented
    datagrams (CVE-2018-11806)
    
    * QEMU: slirp: heap buffer overflow in tcp_emu() (CVE-2019-6778)
    
    * QEMU: ne2000: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow issue
    (CVE-2018-10839)
    
    * QEMU: pcnet: integer overflow leads to buffer overflow (CVE-2018-17962)
    
    * QEMU: qxl: null pointer dereference while releasing spice resources
    (CVE-2019-12155)
    --
    
    SL6
      x86_64
        qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.x86_64.rpm
        qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.x86_64.rpm
        qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.x86_64.rpm
        qemu-kvm-debuginfo-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.x86_64.rpm
        qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.x86_64.rpm
      i386
        qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.i686.rpm
        qemu-kvm-debuginfo-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.5.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.