SciLinux: SLSA-2019-3872-1 Important: kernel on SL7.x x86_64

    Date14 Nov 2019
    125
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    hw: Intel GPU blitter manipulation can allow for arbitrary kernel memory write (CVE-2019-0155) SL7 x86_64 bpftool-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm bpftool-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm kernel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm kernel-debug-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm kernel-debug-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm kernel-debug-devel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7. [More...]
    Synopsis:          Important: kernel security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:3872-1
    Issue Date:        2019-11-14
    CVE Numbers:       None
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * hw: Intel GPU blitter manipulation can allow for arbitrary kernel memory
    write (CVE-2019-0155)
    --
    
    SL7
      x86_64
        bpftool-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        bpftool-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-debug-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-debug-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-debug-devel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-devel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-headers-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-tools-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-tools-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-tools-libs-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        perf-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        perf-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        python-perf-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        python-perf-debuginfo-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
        kernel-tools-libs-devel-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.x86_64.rpm
      noarch
        kernel-abi-whitelists-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.noarch.rpm
        kernel-doc-3.10.0-1062.4.3.el7.noarch.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"66","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.57,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.