Debian: DSA-3989-1: dnsmasq security update

    Date02 Oct 2017
    CategoryDebian
    126
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Felix Wilhelm, Fermin J. Serna, Gabriel Campana, Kevin Hamacher, Ron Bowes and Gynvael Coldwind of the Google Security Team discovered several vulnerabilities in dnsmasq, a small caching DNS proxy and DHCP/TFTP server, which may result in denial of service, information
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3989-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    October 02, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : dnsmasq
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-14491 CVE-2017-14492 CVE-2017-14493 CVE-2017-14494
                     CVE-2017-14495 CVE-2017-14496
    
    Felix Wilhelm, Fermin J. Serna, Gabriel Campana, Kevin Hamacher, Ron
    Bowes and Gynvael Coldwind of the Google Security Team discovered
    several vulnerabilities in dnsmasq, a small caching DNS proxy and
    DHCP/TFTP server, which may result in denial of service, information
    leak or the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed
    in version 2.72-3+deb8u2.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.76-5+deb9u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your dnsmasq packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.