Debian: DSA-3990-1: asterisk security update

    Date03 Oct 2017
    CategoryDebian
    82
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Klaus-Peter Junghann discovered that insufficient validation of RTCP packets in Asterisk may result in an information leak. Please see the upstream advisory at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2017-008.html for
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3990-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 03, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : asterisk
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-14603
    
    Klaus-Peter Junghann discovered that insufficient validation of RTCP
    packets in Asterisk may result in an information leak. Please see the
    upstream advisory at
    http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2017-008.html for
    additional details.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1:11.13.1~dfsg-2+deb8u4.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:13.14.1~dfsg-2+deb9u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your asterisk packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.