Debian: DSA-3991-1: qemu security update

    Date03 Oct 2017
    CategoryDebian
    60
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in in qemu, a fast processor emulator: CVE-2017-9375
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3991-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 03, 2017                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : qemu
    CVE ID         : CVE-2017-9375 CVE-2017-12809 CVE-2017-13672 CVE-2017-13711 
                     CVE-2017-14167
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in in qemu, a fast processor emulator:
    
    CVE-2017-9375
    
        Denial of service via memory leak in USB XHCI emulation.
          
    CVE-2017-12809
    
        Denial of service in the CDROM device drive emulation.
    
    CVE-2017-13672
    
        Denial of service in VGA display emulation.
    
    CVE-2017-13711
    
        Denial of service in SLIRP networking support.
    
    CVE-2017-14167
    
        Incorrect validation of multiboot headers could result in the
        execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your qemu packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.