Debian: DSA-4375-1: spice security update

    Date29 Jan 2019
    CategoryDebian
    2048
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Christophe Fergeau discovered an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in spice, a SPICE protocol client and server library, which might result in denial of service (spice server crash), or possibly, execution of arbitrary code.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4375-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    January 29, 2019                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : spice
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-3813
    Debian Bug     : 920762
    
    Christophe Fergeau discovered an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in
    spice, a SPICE protocol client and server library, which might result in
    denial of service (spice server crash), or possibly, execution of
    arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (stretch), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.12.8-2.1+deb9u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your spice packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of spice please refer to its security
    tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/spice
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.