Debian: DSA-4572-1: slurm-llnl security update

    Date18 Nov 2019
    CategoryDebian
    499
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered in the Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management (SLURM), a cluster resource management and job scheduling system did not escape strings when importing an archive file into the accounting_storage/mysql backend, resulting in SQL injection.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4572-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    November 18, 2019                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : slurm-llnl
    CVE ID         : CVE-2019-12838
    
    It was discovered in the Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management
    (SLURM), a cluster resource management and job scheduling system did
    not escape strings when importing an archive file into the
    accounting_storage/mysql backend, resulting in SQL injection.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 18.08.5.2-1+deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your slurm-llnl packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of slurm-llnl please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/slurm-llnl
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"66","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.04,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.57,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.