Ubuntu 4053-1: GVfs vulnerabilities

    Date 09 Jul 2019
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues were fixed in GVfs.
    Ubuntu Security Notice USN-4053-1
    July 09, 2019
    gvfs vulnerabilities
    A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:
    - Ubuntu 19.04
    - Ubuntu 18.10
    - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
    - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    Several security issues were fixed in GVfs.
    Software Description:
    - gvfs: Userspace virtual filesystem
    It was discovered that GVfs incorrectly handled the admin backend. Files
    created or moved by the admin backend could end up with the wrong ownership
    information, contrary to expectations. This issue only affected Ubuntu
    18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.10, and Ubuntu 19.04. (CVE-2019-12447, CVE-2019-12448,
    It was discovered that GVfs incorrectly handled authentication on its
    private D-Bus socket. A local attacker could possibly connect to this
    socket and issue D-Bus calls. (CVE-2019-12795)
    Update instructions:
    The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following
    package versions:
    Ubuntu 19.04:
      gvfs                            1.40.1-1ubuntu0.1
      gvfs-backends                   1.40.1-1ubuntu0.1
    Ubuntu 18.10:
      gvfs                            1.38.1-0ubuntu1.3.2
      gvfs-backends                   1.38.1-0ubuntu1.3.2
    Ubuntu 18.04 LTS:
      gvfs                            1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3
      gvfs-backends                   1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3
    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
      gvfs                            1.28.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.3
      gvfs-backends                   1.28.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.3
    In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
      CVE-2019-12447, CVE-2019-12448, CVE-2019-12449, CVE-2019-12795
    Package Information:

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"20","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.24,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200


    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.